In Mark 16:9-20, Scribes wrote a 'longer ending' to New Testament Bible - Bart Ehrman
100+ hours of research. Is the longer ending of Mark authentic?: The Mark Series pt 69 (16:9-20)
Mark 16:9-20, 11 verses are missing in earliest manuscripts. Scribes added them later-Daniel Wallace
On Mark 16:9-20, RSV Bible places the 12 'longer ending' verses in a footnote - Bruce Metzger
Dr White's Perspective on the Longer Ending of Mark
In Mark 16:9-20, Codex Sinaiticus & Codex Vaticanus do not have the long ending - Daniel Wallace
The Fitting End to Mark’s Gospel (Mark 16:9-20)
Is Mark´s "long" ending (16:9-20) part of the New Testament? Wilbur Pickering/Textual criticism.
The Authenticity Of Mark 16:9-20
How can you trust the New Testament when the original manuscripts are different?
The fake longer ending of Mark? | Mark 16:9-20 | Dominic Steele | Daily Bible Time | 1 April 2021
Is the ending of Mark's Gospel authentic? | Highlight
IS MARK 16:9-20 INSPIRED SCRIPTURE? The evidence for and against the longer ending of mark 16
Greek NT: Did Mark write the end of Mark?
Is Mark 16:9-20 Really Not in the Oldest Manuscripts?
Bart Ehrman - Mark 16:9-20 is fake
Mark 16:9-20 (My Response to John MacArthur's Verdict)
Gospel of Mark: Longer or Shorter Ending? (Is 16:9-20 Authentic?)
The Long Ending of Mark, Mark 16:9-20
The Longer Ending of Mark - Mark 16:9-20
